Key Concept: Fundamental Rights vs. Directive Principles, Decision-Making Powers
d) Judicial interpretation seeks a harmonious construction respecting both.
[Solution Description]
In the constitutional framework, when conflicts arise between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy, courts often face challenges balancing individual rights with societal goals. The judiciary has devised ways to interpret these conflicts through various principles like harmonization or prioritizing certain rights under specific circumstances. One notable judicial principle is that while Fundamental Rights are justiciable and enforceable by law, Directive Principles act as non-justiciable guidelines for state policy-making. Over time, precedents have shown that Directive Principles can guide governance without overriding Fundamental Rights unless a constitutional amendment specifies otherwise.
A landmark case and judicial decision that illustrates this resolution method is the Minerva Mills Case (1980), where the Supreme Court of India upheld the basic structure doctrine, emphasizing harmony and balance between the two, ensuring that neither overshadows the other but works towards the collective good.
Your Answer is correct.
d) Judicial interpretation seeks a harmonious construction respecting both.
[Solution Description]
In the constitutional framework, when conflicts arise between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy, courts often face challenges balancing individual rights with societal goals. The judiciary has devised ways to interpret these conflicts through various principles like harmonization or prioritizing certain rights under specific circumstances. One notable judicial principle is that while Fundamental Rights are justiciable and enforceable by law, Directive Principles act as non-justiciable guidelines for state policy-making. Over time, precedents have shown that Directive Principles can guide governance without overriding Fundamental Rights unless a constitutional amendment specifies otherwise.
A landmark case and judicial decision that illustrates this resolution method is the Minerva Mills Case (1980), where the Supreme Court of India upheld the basic structure doctrine, emphasizing harmony and balance between the two, ensuring that neither overshadows the other but works towards the collective good.