Key Concept: Rural Economy, Political Strategies
b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
To determine the correctness of both statements, we need to understand the role of pastoralists in the historical context of the rural economy. During ancient times, pastoralists played a vital role by providing livestock products such as meat, wool, and milk, which were critical not only for local consumption but also for trade purposes. Their mobility allowed the exchange of goods over long distances, thus integrating different regions economically.
On the other hand, political rulers often relied on these groups for resources that were essential for sustaining armies, supporting agriculture with fertilization through manure, and contributing to general economic activity. By doing so, they helped consolidate the power of rulers who could provide protection or favorable conditions in return.
Both the Assertion and Reason are true because pastoralists did contribute significantly to the rural economy, benefiting the ruling class indirectly. However, the Reason as stated does not adequately explain why their integration specifically benefitted political rulers; instead, it refers more broadly to economic stabilization rather than direct political gain.
Therefore, while both statements are true, the Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.
Your Answer is correct.
Solution: b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
To determine the correctness of both statements, we need to understand the role of pastoralists in the historical context of the rural economy. During ancient times, pastoralists played a vital role by providing livestock products such as meat, wool, and milk, which were critical not only for local consumption but also for trade purposes. Their mobility allowed the exchange of goods over long distances, thus integrating different regions economically.
On the other hand, political rulers often relied on these groups for resources that were essential for sustaining armies, supporting agriculture with fertilization through manure, and contributing to general economic activity. By doing so, they helped consolidate the power of rulers who could provide protection or favorable conditions in return.
Both the Assertion and Reason are true because pastoralists did contribute significantly to the rural economy, benefiting the ruling class indirectly. However, the Reason as stated does not adequately explain why their integration specifically benefitted political rulers; instead, it refers more broadly to economic stabilization rather than direct political gain.
Therefore, while both statements are true, the Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.