Key Concept: Advanced Calculations, In-depth Analysis
b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
To solve this problem, we need to understand the relationships between the mean life $$(\tau),$$ the half-life $$T_{1/2}$$, and the decay constant $$\lambda$$.
The mean life $$\tau$$ is given by:
$$\tau = \frac{1}{\lambda}$$
The half-life $$T_{1/2}$$ is related to the decay constant by:
$$T_{1/2} = \frac{\ln(2)}{\lambda}$$
Comparing these two equations:
$$\tau = \frac{1}{\lambda}, \quad T_{1/2} = \frac{\ln(2)}{\lambda}$$
It can be observed that:
$$\tau > T_{1/2} \text{ because } 1 > \ln(2)$$
So, the assertion is true.
Now, let’s consider the reason. As $$\lambda$$ increases, $$T_{1/2}$$ decreases because it is inversely proportional to $$\lambda$$. Similarly, $$\tau$$ also decreases for the same reason. However, the relationship described in the reason does not specifically explain why $$\tau$$ is always greater than $$T_{1/2}$$. It merely states that both decrease as $$\lambda$$ increases without explaining their comparative magnitudes.
Therefore, while both statements are true, the reason provided doesn’t adequately explain the assertion.
Your Answer is correct.
b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
To solve this problem, we need to understand the relationships between the mean life $$(\tau),$$ the half-life $$T_{1/2}$$, and the decay constant $$\lambda$$.
The mean life $$\tau$$ is given by:
$$\tau = \frac{1}{\lambda}$$
The half-life $$T_{1/2}$$ is related to the decay constant by:
$$T_{1/2} = \frac{\ln(2)}{\lambda}$$
Comparing these two equations:
$$\tau = \frac{1}{\lambda}, \quad T_{1/2} = \frac{\ln(2)}{\lambda}$$
It can be observed that:
$$\tau > T_{1/2} \text{ because } 1 > \ln(2)$$
So, the assertion is true.
Now, let’s consider the reason. As $$\lambda$$ increases, $$T_{1/2}$$ decreases because it is inversely proportional to $$\lambda$$. Similarly, $$\tau$$ also decreases for the same reason. However, the relationship described in the reason does not specifically explain why $$\tau$$ is always greater than $$T_{1/2}$$. It merely states that both decrease as $$\lambda$$ increases without explaining their comparative magnitudes.
Therefore, while both statements are true, the reason provided doesn’t adequately explain the assertion.